Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:06

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
RFK Jr. looks to fast track rare disease drug approvals (updated) - Seeking Alpha
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
How can I effectively remove vocals from a song without affecting the music quality?
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
No Deposit Casino 2025: Uptown Aces Launches No Deposit Bonus - GlobeNewswire
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Amazon Offers Fire TV Soundbar for Practically Free to Clear Out Stock Before Prime Day - Gizmodo
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How do you protect the collagen in your face?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Walmart Nintendo Switch 2 pre-order: some US customers can buy it again - The Shortcut | Matt Swider
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How is AI prompt engineering transforming the development of multimodal AI applications?